SHORELAND AND PROPERTY INFORMATION
(from
MMA's Handbook for Local Planning Boards: A Legal
Perspective, August 1982, rev. 1991)
prepared by Rebecca Warren Seel, Senior Staff Attorney
This Maine Municipal Association publication is presented for "Classroom Use Only." Its intended use is to stimulate and aid in discussion and role playing within a classroom setting.
| 16. LOT AREA | 17. FRONTAGE ON ROAD (FT.) |
| 18. SO. FT. OF LOT TO BE COVERED BY NON-VEGETATED SURFACES. | 19. ELEVATION ABOVE 100 YR. FLOOD |
| 20. FRONTAGE ON WATERBODY (FT.) | 21. HEIGHT OF PROPOSED STRUCTURE |
| 22. EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY | 23. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY |
| Note: Questions 24 & 25 apply only to expansions of portions of existing structures which are less than the required setback | |
| 24. A) SQ. FT. OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK AS OF 1/1/89: | 25. A) CU. FT. OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK AS OF 1/1/89: |
| B) SQ. FT. OF EXPANSIONS OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 1/1/89 TO PRESENT: | B) CU. FT. OF EXPANSIONS OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 1/1/89 TO PRESENT: |
| C) SQ. FT. OF PROPOSED EXPANSION OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK: | C) CU. FT. OF PROPOSED EXPANSION OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK: |
| D) % INCREASE OF SQ. FT. OF
ACTUAL AND PROPOSED EXPANSIONS OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN REQUIRED SETBACK
SINCE 1/1/89: (% INCREASE = (B + C) /A x 100) |
D) % INCREASE OF
CU. FT. OF ACTUAL AND PROPOSED EXPANSIONS OF PORTION OF STRUCTURE WHICH IS LESS THAN
REQUIRED SETBACK SINCE 1/1/89: (% INCREASE = (B + C) /A x 100) |
NOTE: IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT EACH MUNICIPALITY DEFINE WHAT CONSTITUTES A STRUCTURE, FLOOR AREA, AND VOLUME AND APPLY THOSE DEFINITIONS UNIFORMLY WHEN CALCULATING EXISTING AND PROPOSED SQ. FT. AND CU. FT.